Different Behavior-Change Messaging Techniques Do Not Increase Customers’ Hand Sanitization Adherence During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Natural Behavioral Study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Different Behavior-Change Messaging Techniques Do Not Increase Customers’ Hand Sanitization Adherence During the COVID-19 Pandemic : A Natural Behavioral Study. / Booker, Lauren A.; Cordon, Emma L.; Pedersen, Hanne Sæderup; Fosgerau, Christina Fogtmann; Egerton, Simon; Chan, Carina K.Y.; Skinner, Timothy C.

I: Frontiers in Psychology, Bind 13, 876131, 09.06.2022.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Booker, LA, Cordon, EL, Pedersen, HS, Fosgerau, CF, Egerton, S, Chan, CKY & Skinner, TC 2022, 'Different Behavior-Change Messaging Techniques Do Not Increase Customers’ Hand Sanitization Adherence During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Natural Behavioral Study', Frontiers in Psychology, bind 13, 876131. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.876131

APA

Booker, L. A., Cordon, E. L., Pedersen, H. S., Fosgerau, C. F., Egerton, S., Chan, C. K. Y., & Skinner, T. C. (2022). Different Behavior-Change Messaging Techniques Do Not Increase Customers’ Hand Sanitization Adherence During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Natural Behavioral Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, [876131]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.876131

Vancouver

Booker LA, Cordon EL, Pedersen HS, Fosgerau CF, Egerton S, Chan CKY o.a. Different Behavior-Change Messaging Techniques Do Not Increase Customers’ Hand Sanitization Adherence During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Natural Behavioral Study. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022 jun. 9;13. 876131. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.876131

Author

Booker, Lauren A. ; Cordon, Emma L. ; Pedersen, Hanne Sæderup ; Fosgerau, Christina Fogtmann ; Egerton, Simon ; Chan, Carina K.Y. ; Skinner, Timothy C. / Different Behavior-Change Messaging Techniques Do Not Increase Customers’ Hand Sanitization Adherence During the COVID-19 Pandemic : A Natural Behavioral Study. I: Frontiers in Psychology. 2022 ; Bind 13.

Bibtex

@article{504637afccb341268f8ae3d22eb5100e,
title = "Different Behavior-Change Messaging Techniques Do Not Increase Customers{\textquoteright} Hand Sanitization Adherence During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Natural Behavioral Study",
abstract = "Introduction: Hand hygiene is an integral public health strategy in reducing the transmission of COVID-19, yet the past research has shown hand hygiene practices among the public is sub-optimal. This study aimed to (1) quantify hand sanitization rates among the public to minimize the transmission of COVID-19 and (2) evaluate whether different public health messaging, based on various behavior-change theories influences hand hygiene behavior in a natural setting. Methods: An observational, naturalistic study design was used with real-time customer activity data recorded against hand sanitizer usage in a regional hardware store. Primary outcome from the study was to measure the usage ratio by counting the amount of activity versus usage of hand sanitizer per hour against individual messages based on their behavioral change technique (BCT). Results: There was no significant difference between the baseline message and any of the intervention messages [F(16,904) = 1.19, p = 0.279] or between BCT groups [F(3,906) = 1.33, p = 0.263]. Post hoc tests showed no significant difference between messages (social comparison, p = 0.395; information, p = 1.00; and action planning, p = 1.00). Conclusion: This study showed that even during a pandemic, hand hygiene usage rates in a public setting were similar to the past studies and that compliance did not shift dependent on the public message displayed. This raises questions on whether requirements imposed on businesses to provide hand sanitizer to patrons are an ineffective and maybe an unnecessary economic burden. A measured approach to risk and behavioral analysis surrounding the use of hand sanitizer in a pandemic is suggested as a better approach to inform public policy on the value of hand sanitizer.",
keywords = "Australia, coronavirus, COVID, hand sanitization, infection preventive behavior, pandemic, public health",
author = "Booker, {Lauren A.} and Cordon, {Emma L.} and Pedersen, {Hanne S{\ae}derup} and Fosgerau, {Christina Fogtmann} and Simon Egerton and Chan, {Carina K.Y.} and Skinner, {Timothy C.}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2022 Booker, Cordon, Pedersen, Fosgerau, Egerton, Chan and Skinner.",
year = "2022",
month = jun,
day = "9",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2022.876131",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Different Behavior-Change Messaging Techniques Do Not Increase Customers’ Hand Sanitization Adherence During the COVID-19 Pandemic

T2 - A Natural Behavioral Study

AU - Booker, Lauren A.

AU - Cordon, Emma L.

AU - Pedersen, Hanne Sæderup

AU - Fosgerau, Christina Fogtmann

AU - Egerton, Simon

AU - Chan, Carina K.Y.

AU - Skinner, Timothy C.

N1 - Copyright © 2022 Booker, Cordon, Pedersen, Fosgerau, Egerton, Chan and Skinner.

PY - 2022/6/9

Y1 - 2022/6/9

N2 - Introduction: Hand hygiene is an integral public health strategy in reducing the transmission of COVID-19, yet the past research has shown hand hygiene practices among the public is sub-optimal. This study aimed to (1) quantify hand sanitization rates among the public to minimize the transmission of COVID-19 and (2) evaluate whether different public health messaging, based on various behavior-change theories influences hand hygiene behavior in a natural setting. Methods: An observational, naturalistic study design was used with real-time customer activity data recorded against hand sanitizer usage in a regional hardware store. Primary outcome from the study was to measure the usage ratio by counting the amount of activity versus usage of hand sanitizer per hour against individual messages based on their behavioral change technique (BCT). Results: There was no significant difference between the baseline message and any of the intervention messages [F(16,904) = 1.19, p = 0.279] or between BCT groups [F(3,906) = 1.33, p = 0.263]. Post hoc tests showed no significant difference between messages (social comparison, p = 0.395; information, p = 1.00; and action planning, p = 1.00). Conclusion: This study showed that even during a pandemic, hand hygiene usage rates in a public setting were similar to the past studies and that compliance did not shift dependent on the public message displayed. This raises questions on whether requirements imposed on businesses to provide hand sanitizer to patrons are an ineffective and maybe an unnecessary economic burden. A measured approach to risk and behavioral analysis surrounding the use of hand sanitizer in a pandemic is suggested as a better approach to inform public policy on the value of hand sanitizer.

AB - Introduction: Hand hygiene is an integral public health strategy in reducing the transmission of COVID-19, yet the past research has shown hand hygiene practices among the public is sub-optimal. This study aimed to (1) quantify hand sanitization rates among the public to minimize the transmission of COVID-19 and (2) evaluate whether different public health messaging, based on various behavior-change theories influences hand hygiene behavior in a natural setting. Methods: An observational, naturalistic study design was used with real-time customer activity data recorded against hand sanitizer usage in a regional hardware store. Primary outcome from the study was to measure the usage ratio by counting the amount of activity versus usage of hand sanitizer per hour against individual messages based on their behavioral change technique (BCT). Results: There was no significant difference between the baseline message and any of the intervention messages [F(16,904) = 1.19, p = 0.279] or between BCT groups [F(3,906) = 1.33, p = 0.263]. Post hoc tests showed no significant difference between messages (social comparison, p = 0.395; information, p = 1.00; and action planning, p = 1.00). Conclusion: This study showed that even during a pandemic, hand hygiene usage rates in a public setting were similar to the past studies and that compliance did not shift dependent on the public message displayed. This raises questions on whether requirements imposed on businesses to provide hand sanitizer to patrons are an ineffective and maybe an unnecessary economic burden. A measured approach to risk and behavioral analysis surrounding the use of hand sanitizer in a pandemic is suggested as a better approach to inform public policy on the value of hand sanitizer.

KW - Australia

KW - coronavirus

KW - COVID

KW - hand sanitization

KW - infection preventive behavior

KW - pandemic

KW - public health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133435538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.876131

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.876131

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35756219

AN - SCOPUS:85133435538

VL - 13

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

M1 - 876131

ER -

ID: 318011621