RoboDoc: Semiotic resources for achieving face-to-screenface formation with a telepresence robot

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

RoboDoc : Semiotic resources for achieving face-to-screenface formation with a telepresence robot . / Due, Brian Lystgaard.

In: Semiotica, Vol. 2021, No. 238, 2021, p. 253-278.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Due, BL 2021, 'RoboDoc: Semiotic resources for achieving face-to-screenface formation with a telepresence robot ', Semiotica, vol. 2021, no. 238, pp. 253-278. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0148

APA

Due, B. L. (2021). RoboDoc: Semiotic resources for achieving face-to-screenface formation with a telepresence robot . Semiotica, 2021(238), 253-278. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0148

Vancouver

Due BL. RoboDoc: Semiotic resources for achieving face-to-screenface formation with a telepresence robot . Semiotica. 2021;2021(238):253-278. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0148

Author

Due, Brian Lystgaard. / RoboDoc : Semiotic resources for achieving face-to-screenface formation with a telepresence robot . In: Semiotica. 2021 ; Vol. 2021, No. 238. pp. 253-278.

Bibtex

@article{55d00ed51920489caeb20f54e406a3a3,
title = "RoboDoc: Semiotic resources for achieving face-to-screenface formation with a telepresence robot ",
abstract = "Face-to-face interaction is a primordial site for human activity and intersubjectivity. Empirical studies have shown how people reflexively exhibit a face orientation and work to establish a formation in which everyone is facing each other in local participation frameworks. The Face has also been described by, e.g., Levinas as the basis for a first ethical philosophy. Humans have established these Face-formations when interacting since time immemorial, but what happens when one of the participants is present through a telepresence robot? Based on ethnomethodology, Peircean/Goodwinian semiotics, multimodal conversation analysis and video data from a Danish residential rehabilitation center, the article shows the ways in which participants manage to interactively, cooperatively, and moment by moment achieve an F-formation in situ. The article contributes a detailed analysis and discussion of the kind of participant a telepresence robot is, in and through situated interactions: I propose that we term this participant the RoboDoc, given that it is an assemblage of a doctor who controls a robot. By focusing on the affordances of mobility, the article contributes to a renewed understanding of the importance and relevance of establishing Face-orientations in an increasingly technofied telepresence world.",
author = "Due, {Brian Lystgaard}",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1515/sem-2018-0148",
language = "English",
volume = "2021",
pages = "253--278",
journal = "Semiotica",
issn = "0037-1998",
publisher = "Mouton de Gruyter",
number = "238",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - RoboDoc

T2 - Semiotic resources for achieving face-to-screenface formation with a telepresence robot

AU - Due, Brian Lystgaard

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Face-to-face interaction is a primordial site for human activity and intersubjectivity. Empirical studies have shown how people reflexively exhibit a face orientation and work to establish a formation in which everyone is facing each other in local participation frameworks. The Face has also been described by, e.g., Levinas as the basis for a first ethical philosophy. Humans have established these Face-formations when interacting since time immemorial, but what happens when one of the participants is present through a telepresence robot? Based on ethnomethodology, Peircean/Goodwinian semiotics, multimodal conversation analysis and video data from a Danish residential rehabilitation center, the article shows the ways in which participants manage to interactively, cooperatively, and moment by moment achieve an F-formation in situ. The article contributes a detailed analysis and discussion of the kind of participant a telepresence robot is, in and through situated interactions: I propose that we term this participant the RoboDoc, given that it is an assemblage of a doctor who controls a robot. By focusing on the affordances of mobility, the article contributes to a renewed understanding of the importance and relevance of establishing Face-orientations in an increasingly technofied telepresence world.

AB - Face-to-face interaction is a primordial site for human activity and intersubjectivity. Empirical studies have shown how people reflexively exhibit a face orientation and work to establish a formation in which everyone is facing each other in local participation frameworks. The Face has also been described by, e.g., Levinas as the basis for a first ethical philosophy. Humans have established these Face-formations when interacting since time immemorial, but what happens when one of the participants is present through a telepresence robot? Based on ethnomethodology, Peircean/Goodwinian semiotics, multimodal conversation analysis and video data from a Danish residential rehabilitation center, the article shows the ways in which participants manage to interactively, cooperatively, and moment by moment achieve an F-formation in situ. The article contributes a detailed analysis and discussion of the kind of participant a telepresence robot is, in and through situated interactions: I propose that we term this participant the RoboDoc, given that it is an assemblage of a doctor who controls a robot. By focusing on the affordances of mobility, the article contributes to a renewed understanding of the importance and relevance of establishing Face-orientations in an increasingly technofied telepresence world.

U2 - 10.1515/sem-2018-0148

DO - 10.1515/sem-2018-0148

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2021

SP - 253

EP - 278

JO - Semiotica

JF - Semiotica

SN - 0037-1998

IS - 238

ER -

ID: 255997838