The perception of two linguistic functions of prosody in Danish

Publikation: Konferencebidrag › Paper › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

The perception of two linguistic functions of prosody in Danish. / Tøndering, John; Morris, David Jackson.

2015. Paper præsenteret ved International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Storbritannien.

Publikation: Konferencebidrag › Paper › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Tøndering, J & Morris, DJ 2015, 'The perception of two linguistic functions of prosody in Danish', Paper fremlagt ved International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Storbritannien, 10/08/2015.

APA

Tøndering, J., & Morris, D. J. (2015). The perception of two linguistic functions of prosody in Danish. Paper præsenteret ved International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Storbritannien.

Vancouver

Tøndering J, Morris DJ. The perception of two linguistic functions of prosody in Danish. 2015. Paper præsenteret ved International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Storbritannien.

Author

Tøndering, John ; Morris, David Jackson. / The perception of two linguistic functions of prosody in Danish. Paper præsenteret ved International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Storbritannien.4 s.

Bibtex

@conference{4fbec28f20324275802c88c597119051,
title = "The perception of two linguistic functions of prosody in Danish",
abstract = "This paper examines the prosodic perceptual ability of listeners (n=22) in tasks involving global intonation contours and local voice pitch variation. The signaling of utterance type was tested with speech material that included read and non-scripted questions and statements. Local variation was tested with an identification task where the level of prominence of an anaphor signaled either the subject or non-subject of a preceding sentence. Logistic regression revealed that question and statement identification differed between read and non-scripted material and was not linked to performance on the subject/non-subject task. A response bias was also observed in the vocoded condition towards statements. W e conclude that performance differences between the two tasks may be due either to the task-related language ability of the listener or to differences in the perception of global and local prosody.",
author = "John T{\o}ndering and Morris, {David Jackson}",
note = "From Proceedings ICPhS ISSN 241-0669, International Phonetic Association: London; International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS ; Conference date: 10-08-2015",
year = "2015",
language = "English",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - The perception of two linguistic functions of prosody in Danish

AU - Tøndering, John

AU - Morris, David Jackson

N1 - From Proceedings ICPhS ISSN 241-0669, International Phonetic Association: London

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This paper examines the prosodic perceptual ability of listeners (n=22) in tasks involving global intonation contours and local voice pitch variation. The signaling of utterance type was tested with speech material that included read and non-scripted questions and statements. Local variation was tested with an identification task where the level of prominence of an anaphor signaled either the subject or non-subject of a preceding sentence. Logistic regression revealed that question and statement identification differed between read and non-scripted material and was not linked to performance on the subject/non-subject task. A response bias was also observed in the vocoded condition towards statements. W e conclude that performance differences between the two tasks may be due either to the task-related language ability of the listener or to differences in the perception of global and local prosody.

AB - This paper examines the prosodic perceptual ability of listeners (n=22) in tasks involving global intonation contours and local voice pitch variation. The signaling of utterance type was tested with speech material that included read and non-scripted questions and statements. Local variation was tested with an identification task where the level of prominence of an anaphor signaled either the subject or non-subject of a preceding sentence. Logistic regression revealed that question and statement identification differed between read and non-scripted material and was not linked to performance on the subject/non-subject task. A response bias was also observed in the vocoded condition towards statements. W e conclude that performance differences between the two tasks may be due either to the task-related language ability of the listener or to differences in the perception of global and local prosody.

M3 - Paper

T2 - International Congress of Phonetic Sciences

Y2 - 10 August 2015

ER -

ID: 143862884