“Trajectories of treatment response in a cognitive-behavioral therapy intervention for depression and adherence in persons with HIV in South Africa”

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 1,21 MB, PDF-dokument

Background
People with HIV (PHW) are at greater risk of depression than the general population. Insight into the time-to-treatment-response and predictors of response to psychotherapy may improve implementation in primary care.

Methods
We assessed depression treatment response among 80 participants in a trial of cognitive-behavioral therapy for adherence and depression (CBT-AD) for PWH with MDD and suboptimal antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence. Participants self-reported depressive symptoms (CESsingle bondD) at each therapy session. Clinicians assessed participants' depression (HAMsingle bondD), along with potential predictors of response, every four months for one year. Latent class analyses examined classes of responders for the active and the post-treatment phases. Regression analyses identified predictors of class membership for each phase.

Results
During the active treatment phase (CESsingle bondD) we identified an early response (at session 2 and with continued trajectory of improvement) and a non-response group. There were also two classes during post-treatment (HAM-D): early responders (4-month) and late responders (12-month). Distress aversion was associated with lower likelihood of early response to CBT-AD (aOR = 0.74, 95%CI[0.56–0.90], p = .009), and social support was associated with increased likelihood of early response (aOR = 2.24, 95%CI[1.07–5.46], p = .045).

Limitations
Self-reported depression during the treatment phase may have resulted from social desirability bias.

Conclusions
Most participants responded to CBT-AD early during treatment (89 %) and had sustained improvements in depression by 4 months (80 %). Distress aversion was a risk factor for late response, and social support was protective. Future research is needed to assess the optimal dose of CBT-AD in resource limited settings.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Affective Disorders
Vol/bind343
Sider (fra-til)136-143
Antal sider8
ISSN0165-0327
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2023

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
AS was supported by an NIMH grant award: K23MH131438. SS received royalties from Oxford University Press, Guilford Publications and Springer/Humana Press.Funding for this project came from a National Institute of Mental Health grant R01MH103770. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Mental Health or the National Institutes of Health. Some of the author time, and resources for statistical consultation were also supported by grant 1P30MH116867. The authors also wish to thank and acknowledge the inputs of Michelle Jacobo, PhD, Rosana Smith-Alvarez, Noelle Mendez, Norik Kirakosian, Nicola De Kock, MA, Hlombekazi Sybil Majokweni, Jade Witten, Patricia Yoliswa Mtingeni, Nokuphumla Nofeliti, Thulani Njengele, Andiswa Gidana, Tandiwe Mngxuma, Nomvula Mdwaba, Neliswa Kotelo, Zimkhitha Ndinga, and Carla Freeman. We would also like to acknowledge the City of Cape Town Department of Health for their support and for granting us access to their clinics. Thank you also to the staff, patients, and Community Advisory Boards at the respective clinics for their time, effort, and support.

Funding Information:
Funding for this project came from a National Institute of Mental Health grant R01MH103770 . The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Mental Health or the National Institutes of Health. Some of the author time, and resources for statistical consultation were also supported by grant 1P30MH116867.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors

ID: 374269866