Antibiotika i almen praksis. En fælles beslutning?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Antibiotika i almen praksis. En fælles beslutning? / Lindell, Johanna.

I: Akademisk kvarter, Bind 12, 10.2015, s. 102-117.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Lindell, J 2015, 'Antibiotika i almen praksis. En fælles beslutning?', Akademisk kvarter, bind 12, s. 102-117.

APA

Lindell, J. (2015). Antibiotika i almen praksis. En fælles beslutning? Akademisk kvarter, 12, 102-117.

Vancouver

Lindell J. Antibiotika i almen praksis. En fælles beslutning? Akademisk kvarter. 2015 okt.;12:102-117.

Author

Lindell, Johanna. / Antibiotika i almen praksis. En fælles beslutning?. I: Akademisk kvarter. 2015 ; Bind 12. s. 102-117.

Bibtex

@article{27d3360a55bb47e69291b95e46c3effd,
title = "Antibiotika i almen praksis. En f{\ae}lles beslutning?",
abstract = "Patient involvement and shared decision making (SDM) in treatmentis increasingly on the health care agenda both nationally andinternationally. Studies have shown that the benefits of actively includingpatients in decisions about their health care improves theirhealth, satisfaction and agency, as well as being more cost-efficient(SUM 2014,2). SDM has been shown helpful in the primary sectorin lowering the use of antibiotics (Legare et al 2012), where growingresistance due to antibiotic overuse is a public health problem, withprimary care responsible for 90% of the prescriptions in Denmark.Using Conversation Analysis on a dataset of 13 cases this study investigateshow treatment decisions for antibiotics are made in primarycare and whether the interaction follows the ideal of SDM. Itfinds that most treatment recommendations are presented as decisionsalready made, not encouraging the patient to participate inthe decision making. ",
author = "Johanna Lindell",
year = "2015",
month = oct,
language = "Dansk",
volume = "12",
pages = "102--117",
journal = "Akademisk kvarter",
issn = "1904-0008",
publisher = "Aalborg Universitetsforlag",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Antibiotika i almen praksis. En fælles beslutning?

AU - Lindell, Johanna

PY - 2015/10

Y1 - 2015/10

N2 - Patient involvement and shared decision making (SDM) in treatmentis increasingly on the health care agenda both nationally andinternationally. Studies have shown that the benefits of actively includingpatients in decisions about their health care improves theirhealth, satisfaction and agency, as well as being more cost-efficient(SUM 2014,2). SDM has been shown helpful in the primary sectorin lowering the use of antibiotics (Legare et al 2012), where growingresistance due to antibiotic overuse is a public health problem, withprimary care responsible for 90% of the prescriptions in Denmark.Using Conversation Analysis on a dataset of 13 cases this study investigateshow treatment decisions for antibiotics are made in primarycare and whether the interaction follows the ideal of SDM. Itfinds that most treatment recommendations are presented as decisionsalready made, not encouraging the patient to participate inthe decision making.

AB - Patient involvement and shared decision making (SDM) in treatmentis increasingly on the health care agenda both nationally andinternationally. Studies have shown that the benefits of actively includingpatients in decisions about their health care improves theirhealth, satisfaction and agency, as well as being more cost-efficient(SUM 2014,2). SDM has been shown helpful in the primary sectorin lowering the use of antibiotics (Legare et al 2012), where growingresistance due to antibiotic overuse is a public health problem, withprimary care responsible for 90% of the prescriptions in Denmark.Using Conversation Analysis on a dataset of 13 cases this study investigateshow treatment decisions for antibiotics are made in primarycare and whether the interaction follows the ideal of SDM. Itfinds that most treatment recommendations are presented as decisionsalready made, not encouraging the patient to participate inthe decision making.

UR - http://www.akademiskkvarter.hum.aau.dk/pdf/vol12/AK_Vol_12_10_2015.pdf

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

VL - 12

SP - 102

EP - 117

JO - Akademisk kvarter

JF - Akademisk kvarter

SN - 1904-0008

ER -

ID: 153730558