Biblical Ethics and Plotinus

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKonferenceartikelForskning

Standard

Biblical Ethics and Plotinus. / Pontoppidan, Maria.

I: Judaica Petropolitana, Bind 1, 2013, s. 56-67.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKonferenceartikelForskning

Harvard

Pontoppidan, M 2013, 'Biblical Ethics and Plotinus', Judaica Petropolitana, bind 1, s. 56-67. <http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26535796>

APA

Pontoppidan, M. (2013). Biblical Ethics and Plotinus. Judaica Petropolitana, 1, 56-67. http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26535796

Vancouver

Pontoppidan M. Biblical Ethics and Plotinus. Judaica Petropolitana. 2013;1:56-67.

Author

Pontoppidan, Maria. / Biblical Ethics and Plotinus. I: Judaica Petropolitana. 2013 ; Bind 1. s. 56-67.

Bibtex

@inproceedings{c4085784d66e456aae40716fcd7a787a,
title = "Biblical Ethics and Plotinus",
abstract = "This article focuses on the question of unification versus relationality in ethics. It compares two different ethical approaches from Late Antiquity, highlighting the contrast between Plotinian (Neoplatonic) ethics as striving for perfect unification of the human soul with the divinity - and Biblical ethics as a relational ethics, where alterity remains operative in the encounter with the deity, and where the primary ethical demand is to relate properly to fellow creatures and God as other. The latter demand is exemplified by the figure of Job, whose righteousness is interpreted as his insisting on this relation at a more fundamental level than his friends.",
keywords = "Faculty of Humanities, Plotinus, Neoplatonic ethics, unification, Book of Job, PLOTINUS, JOB, UNIFICATION, RELATIONALITY, NEOPLATONIC ETHICS",
author = "Maria Pontoppidan",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "56--67",
journal = "Judaica Petropolitana",
issn = "2307-9053",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Biblical Ethics and Plotinus

AU - Pontoppidan, Maria

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This article focuses on the question of unification versus relationality in ethics. It compares two different ethical approaches from Late Antiquity, highlighting the contrast between Plotinian (Neoplatonic) ethics as striving for perfect unification of the human soul with the divinity - and Biblical ethics as a relational ethics, where alterity remains operative in the encounter with the deity, and where the primary ethical demand is to relate properly to fellow creatures and God as other. The latter demand is exemplified by the figure of Job, whose righteousness is interpreted as his insisting on this relation at a more fundamental level than his friends.

AB - This article focuses on the question of unification versus relationality in ethics. It compares two different ethical approaches from Late Antiquity, highlighting the contrast between Plotinian (Neoplatonic) ethics as striving for perfect unification of the human soul with the divinity - and Biblical ethics as a relational ethics, where alterity remains operative in the encounter with the deity, and where the primary ethical demand is to relate properly to fellow creatures and God as other. The latter demand is exemplified by the figure of Job, whose righteousness is interpreted as his insisting on this relation at a more fundamental level than his friends.

KW - Faculty of Humanities

KW - Plotinus, Neoplatonic ethics, unification, Book of Job

KW - PLOTINUS

KW - JOB

KW - UNIFICATION

KW - RELATIONALITY

KW - NEOPLATONIC ETHICS

M3 - Conference article

VL - 1

SP - 56

EP - 67

JO - Judaica Petropolitana

JF - Judaica Petropolitana

SN - 2307-9053

ER -

ID: 38063922