Comparative Nivkh Dictionary

Publikation: Bog/antologi/afhandling/rapportBogForskning

Standard

Comparative Nivkh Dictionary. / Fortescue, Michael David.

München : LINCOM, 2016. 199 s. (Languages of the World/Dictionaries, Bind 62).

Publikation: Bog/antologi/afhandling/rapportBogForskning

Harvard

Fortescue, MD 2016, Comparative Nivkh Dictionary. Languages of the World/Dictionaries, bind 62, LINCOM, München.

APA

Fortescue, M. D. (2016). Comparative Nivkh Dictionary. LINCOM. Languages of the World/Dictionaries Bind 62

Vancouver

Fortescue MD. Comparative Nivkh Dictionary. München: LINCOM, 2016. 199 s. (Languages of the World/Dictionaries, Bind 62).

Author

Fortescue, Michael David. / Comparative Nivkh Dictionary. München : LINCOM, 2016. 199 s. (Languages of the World/Dictionaries, Bind 62).

Bibtex

@book{dcbeac48d00a40ba9397255856adead1,
title = "Comparative Nivkh Dictionary",
abstract = "This dictionary undertakes to reconstruct the lexis and morphology of the Nivkh proto-language by marshaling and organizing all the data available in published form on the contemporary dialects. It builds upon a considerable body of descriptive and comparative work carried out by scholars who have worked with this typologically unique “Paleosiberian” isolate in the past. Although the time depth between the four “dialects” of Nivkh is relatively shallow, the complex morphophonemics of the language allows for quite deep internal reconstruction. Moreover, the differences between the dialects is considerable. Mutual understanding between speakers of the Amur dialect and the East Sakhalin one is low, and still lower between the Amur and the South Sakhalin dialects, all three of which may in fact be regarded as separate languages. The relationship of Nivkh to anything else either in Asia or the New World is a subject of continuing interest to both linguists and anthropologists. The dictionary does not address this question directly. Reconstructing the proto-language is an essential step, however, to any further comparative work – in particular to sorting out the relationship between Nivkh and the other “Paleosiberian” languages. ",
keywords = "Faculty of Humanities, Linguistics, Nivkh, comparative dictionary, Paleosiberian languages",
author = "Fortescue, {Michael David}",
year = "2016",
month = jan,
language = "English",
isbn = "9783862886876",
series = "Languages of the World/Dictionaries",
publisher = "LINCOM",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - Comparative Nivkh Dictionary

AU - Fortescue, Michael David

PY - 2016/1

Y1 - 2016/1

N2 - This dictionary undertakes to reconstruct the lexis and morphology of the Nivkh proto-language by marshaling and organizing all the data available in published form on the contemporary dialects. It builds upon a considerable body of descriptive and comparative work carried out by scholars who have worked with this typologically unique “Paleosiberian” isolate in the past. Although the time depth between the four “dialects” of Nivkh is relatively shallow, the complex morphophonemics of the language allows for quite deep internal reconstruction. Moreover, the differences between the dialects is considerable. Mutual understanding between speakers of the Amur dialect and the East Sakhalin one is low, and still lower between the Amur and the South Sakhalin dialects, all three of which may in fact be regarded as separate languages. The relationship of Nivkh to anything else either in Asia or the New World is a subject of continuing interest to both linguists and anthropologists. The dictionary does not address this question directly. Reconstructing the proto-language is an essential step, however, to any further comparative work – in particular to sorting out the relationship between Nivkh and the other “Paleosiberian” languages.

AB - This dictionary undertakes to reconstruct the lexis and morphology of the Nivkh proto-language by marshaling and organizing all the data available in published form on the contemporary dialects. It builds upon a considerable body of descriptive and comparative work carried out by scholars who have worked with this typologically unique “Paleosiberian” isolate in the past. Although the time depth between the four “dialects” of Nivkh is relatively shallow, the complex morphophonemics of the language allows for quite deep internal reconstruction. Moreover, the differences between the dialects is considerable. Mutual understanding between speakers of the Amur dialect and the East Sakhalin one is low, and still lower between the Amur and the South Sakhalin dialects, all three of which may in fact be regarded as separate languages. The relationship of Nivkh to anything else either in Asia or the New World is a subject of continuing interest to both linguists and anthropologists. The dictionary does not address this question directly. Reconstructing the proto-language is an essential step, however, to any further comparative work – in particular to sorting out the relationship between Nivkh and the other “Paleosiberian” languages.

KW - Faculty of Humanities

KW - Linguistics

KW - Nivkh

KW - comparative dictionary

KW - Paleosiberian languages

M3 - Book

SN - 9783862886876

T3 - Languages of the World/Dictionaries

BT - Comparative Nivkh Dictionary

PB - LINCOM

CY - München

ER -

ID: 156965937