Place attachment and linguistic variation: A quantitative analysis of language and local attachment in a rural village and an urban social housing area

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Place attachment and linguistic variation : A quantitative analysis of language and local attachment in a rural village and an urban social housing area. / Monka, Malene; Quist, Pia; Skovse, Astrid Ravn.

I: Language in Society, Bind 49, Nr. 2, 01.01.2020, s. 173-205.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Monka, M, Quist, P & Skovse, AR 2020, 'Place attachment and linguistic variation: A quantitative analysis of language and local attachment in a rural village and an urban social housing area', Language in Society, bind 49, nr. 2, s. 173-205. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404519000733

APA

Monka, M., Quist, P., & Skovse, A. R. (2020). Place attachment and linguistic variation: A quantitative analysis of language and local attachment in a rural village and an urban social housing area. Language in Society, 49(2), 173-205. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404519000733

Vancouver

Monka M, Quist P, Skovse AR. Place attachment and linguistic variation: A quantitative analysis of language and local attachment in a rural village and an urban social housing area. Language in Society. 2020 jan. 1;49(2):173-205. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404519000733

Author

Monka, Malene ; Quist, Pia ; Skovse, Astrid Ravn. / Place attachment and linguistic variation : A quantitative analysis of language and local attachment in a rural village and an urban social housing area. I: Language in Society. 2020 ; Bind 49, Nr. 2. s. 173-205.

Bibtex

@article{4ca45c1ffb6c4b6fb57c76620d33abf8,
title = "Place attachment and linguistic variation: A quantitative analysis of language and local attachment in a rural village and an urban social housing area",
abstract = "This article presents the results of a quantitative analysis of language variation and place attachment in two different places in Denmark—a rural, mono-ethnic village where traditional dialect is still used in everyday practices, and a multiethnic suburban social housing district where speakers use features associated with regional dialect and multiethnic youth styles. It is argued that variationist sociolinguistics, dialect research, as well as sociolinguistics that foregrounds situated interaction analysis need to develop methodologies that include and combine information about speakers{\textquoteright} individual mobility histories, local practices, and future orientations in relation to language use and place. For this purpose, this study employs a quantified measure, an index of local attachment, of speakers{\textquoteright} attachment to their local area. The index is calculated on the basis of insights from ethnographic fieldwork and interviews, and is compared to the variation of three linguistic variables in each location. Results show differences between the two places, the rural and the urban communities, as well as between individuals that can be explained by differences in place affordances, life histories, and future orientation. (Place, local attachment, mobility, dialect, multiethnic speech style, quantitative analysis)*",
author = "Malene Monka and Pia Quist and Skovse, {Astrid Ravn}",
year = "2020",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0047404519000733",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "173--205",
journal = "Language in Society",
issn = "0047-4045",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Place attachment and linguistic variation

T2 - A quantitative analysis of language and local attachment in a rural village and an urban social housing area

AU - Monka, Malene

AU - Quist, Pia

AU - Skovse, Astrid Ravn

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

N2 - This article presents the results of a quantitative analysis of language variation and place attachment in two different places in Denmark—a rural, mono-ethnic village where traditional dialect is still used in everyday practices, and a multiethnic suburban social housing district where speakers use features associated with regional dialect and multiethnic youth styles. It is argued that variationist sociolinguistics, dialect research, as well as sociolinguistics that foregrounds situated interaction analysis need to develop methodologies that include and combine information about speakers’ individual mobility histories, local practices, and future orientations in relation to language use and place. For this purpose, this study employs a quantified measure, an index of local attachment, of speakers’ attachment to their local area. The index is calculated on the basis of insights from ethnographic fieldwork and interviews, and is compared to the variation of three linguistic variables in each location. Results show differences between the two places, the rural and the urban communities, as well as between individuals that can be explained by differences in place affordances, life histories, and future orientation. (Place, local attachment, mobility, dialect, multiethnic speech style, quantitative analysis)*

AB - This article presents the results of a quantitative analysis of language variation and place attachment in two different places in Denmark—a rural, mono-ethnic village where traditional dialect is still used in everyday practices, and a multiethnic suburban social housing district where speakers use features associated with regional dialect and multiethnic youth styles. It is argued that variationist sociolinguistics, dialect research, as well as sociolinguistics that foregrounds situated interaction analysis need to develop methodologies that include and combine information about speakers’ individual mobility histories, local practices, and future orientations in relation to language use and place. For this purpose, this study employs a quantified measure, an index of local attachment, of speakers’ attachment to their local area. The index is calculated on the basis of insights from ethnographic fieldwork and interviews, and is compared to the variation of three linguistic variables in each location. Results show differences between the two places, the rural and the urban communities, as well as between individuals that can be explained by differences in place affordances, life histories, and future orientation. (Place, local attachment, mobility, dialect, multiethnic speech style, quantitative analysis)*

U2 - 10.1017/S0047404519000733

DO - 10.1017/S0047404519000733

M3 - Journal article

VL - 49

SP - 173

EP - 205

JO - Language in Society

JF - Language in Society

SN - 0047-4045

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 196766633