The effect of health, socio-economic position, and mode of data collection on non-response in health interview surveys

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

The effect of health, socio-economic position, and mode of data collection on non-response in health interview surveys. / Ekholm, Ola; Gundgaard, Jens; Rasmussen, Niels K R; Hansen, Ebba Holme.

I: Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Bind 38, Nr. 7, 2010, s. 699-706.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Ekholm, O, Gundgaard, J, Rasmussen, NKR & Hansen, EH 2010, 'The effect of health, socio-economic position, and mode of data collection on non-response in health interview surveys', Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, bind 38, nr. 7, s. 699-706. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810382474

APA

Ekholm, O., Gundgaard, J., Rasmussen, N. K. R., & Hansen, E. H. (2010). The effect of health, socio-economic position, and mode of data collection on non-response in health interview surveys. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 38(7), 699-706. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810382474

Vancouver

Ekholm O, Gundgaard J, Rasmussen NKR, Hansen EH. The effect of health, socio-economic position, and mode of data collection on non-response in health interview surveys. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 2010;38(7):699-706. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810382474

Author

Ekholm, Ola ; Gundgaard, Jens ; Rasmussen, Niels K R ; Hansen, Ebba Holme. / The effect of health, socio-economic position, and mode of data collection on non-response in health interview surveys. I: Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 2010 ; Bind 38, Nr. 7. s. 699-706.

Bibtex

@article{460d5b60f88a11dfb6d2000ea68e967b,
title = "The effect of health, socio-economic position, and mode of data collection on non-response in health interview surveys",
abstract = "AIMS: To investigate the relationship between potential explanatory factors (socio-economic factors and health) and non-response in two general population health interview surveys (face-to-face and telephone), and to compare the effects of the two interview modes on non-response patterns. METHODS: Data derives from The Danish Health Interview Survey 2000 (face-to-face interview) and The Funen County Health Survey 2000/2001 (telephone interview). Data on all invited individuals were obtained from administrative registers and linked to survey data at individual level. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to examine associations between potential explanatory factors and non-response. RESULTS: The overall response rate was higher in the face-to-face interview survey (74.5%) than in the telephone survey (69.2%). Refusal was the most common reason for non-response and the same factors were generally associated with non-response in both modes of interview. The non-response rate was high among persons with low socio-economic position. No significant associations between health and non-response were found. CONCLUSIONS: Health status does not play a systematic role for non-response rates in health interview surveys, but the non-response rate is higher in lower socio-economic groups. Analyses of non-response should be performed to understand the implications of survey findings.",
keywords = "Former Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences",
author = "Ola Ekholm and Jens Gundgaard and Rasmussen, {Niels K R} and Hansen, {Ebba Holme}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1177/1403494810382474",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "699--706",
journal = "Acta socio-medica Scandinavica",
issn = "1403-4948",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of health, socio-economic position, and mode of data collection on non-response in health interview surveys

AU - Ekholm, Ola

AU - Gundgaard, Jens

AU - Rasmussen, Niels K R

AU - Hansen, Ebba Holme

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - AIMS: To investigate the relationship between potential explanatory factors (socio-economic factors and health) and non-response in two general population health interview surveys (face-to-face and telephone), and to compare the effects of the two interview modes on non-response patterns. METHODS: Data derives from The Danish Health Interview Survey 2000 (face-to-face interview) and The Funen County Health Survey 2000/2001 (telephone interview). Data on all invited individuals were obtained from administrative registers and linked to survey data at individual level. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to examine associations between potential explanatory factors and non-response. RESULTS: The overall response rate was higher in the face-to-face interview survey (74.5%) than in the telephone survey (69.2%). Refusal was the most common reason for non-response and the same factors were generally associated with non-response in both modes of interview. The non-response rate was high among persons with low socio-economic position. No significant associations between health and non-response were found. CONCLUSIONS: Health status does not play a systematic role for non-response rates in health interview surveys, but the non-response rate is higher in lower socio-economic groups. Analyses of non-response should be performed to understand the implications of survey findings.

AB - AIMS: To investigate the relationship between potential explanatory factors (socio-economic factors and health) and non-response in two general population health interview surveys (face-to-face and telephone), and to compare the effects of the two interview modes on non-response patterns. METHODS: Data derives from The Danish Health Interview Survey 2000 (face-to-face interview) and The Funen County Health Survey 2000/2001 (telephone interview). Data on all invited individuals were obtained from administrative registers and linked to survey data at individual level. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to examine associations between potential explanatory factors and non-response. RESULTS: The overall response rate was higher in the face-to-face interview survey (74.5%) than in the telephone survey (69.2%). Refusal was the most common reason for non-response and the same factors were generally associated with non-response in both modes of interview. The non-response rate was high among persons with low socio-economic position. No significant associations between health and non-response were found. CONCLUSIONS: Health status does not play a systematic role for non-response rates in health interview surveys, but the non-response rate is higher in lower socio-economic groups. Analyses of non-response should be performed to understand the implications of survey findings.

KW - Former Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences

U2 - 10.1177/1403494810382474

DO - 10.1177/1403494810382474

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 20851845

VL - 38

SP - 699

EP - 706

JO - Acta socio-medica Scandinavica

JF - Acta socio-medica Scandinavica

SN - 1403-4948

IS - 7

ER -

ID: 23371657