Communication between rehabilitation staff and people with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Communication between rehabilitation staff and people with traumatic brain injury : A systematic review. / Christensen, Iben; Power, Emma; Togher, Leanne; Brassel, Sophie ; Elbourn, Elise ; Folder, Naomi; Jensen, Lise Randrup.

In: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 2023.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Christensen, I, Power, E, Togher, L, Brassel, S, Elbourn, E, Folder, N & Jensen, LR 2023, 'Communication between rehabilitation staff and people with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review', Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2023.2274625

APA

Christensen, I., Power, E., Togher, L., Brassel, S., Elbourn, E., Folder, N., & Jensen, L. R. (2023). Communication between rehabilitation staff and people with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2023.2274625

Vancouver

Christensen I, Power E, Togher L, Brassel S, Elbourn E, Folder N et al. Communication between rehabilitation staff and people with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2023.2274625

Author

Christensen, Iben ; Power, Emma ; Togher, Leanne ; Brassel, Sophie ; Elbourn, Elise ; Folder, Naomi ; Jensen, Lise Randrup. / Communication between rehabilitation staff and people with traumatic brain injury : A systematic review. In: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 2023.

Bibtex

@article{504608713f2145bf93571b1a77cb3b1e,
title = "Communication between rehabilitation staff and people with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review",
abstract = "This systematic review aimed to synthesize barriers and facilitators in communicative interactions between staff and people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the rehabilitation context. Searches captured published evidence up to November 2022 in MEDLINE, Embase, SCOPUS, Web of Science, CINAHL, AMED, and PsycINFO. Eligible studies reported on the communicative interaction between rehabilitation staff and adults with TBI. In total, 31 studies were included in the review; including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods designs. Quality assessment was carried out using standard checklists. Quantitative studies and quantitative components of mixed-method studies were synthesized descriptively according to reported communication barriers and facilitators. Qualitative studies and qualitative components of mixed-method studies were analysed through an inductive thematic meta-synthesis; generating six main themes with four subthemes. Themes were categorized as barriers or facilitators to communicative interaction. Findings demonstrated that cognitive-communication disorders of people with TBI challenge the communicative interaction between rehabilitation staff and people with TBI. However, the extent to which these disorders create a communicative barrier is closely related to staff{\textquoteright}s communicative approach. While staff holding a collaborative and acknowledging approach and using supportive strategies may facilitate successful communicative interactions, staff using the opposite approach may exacerbate communication barriers.",
author = "Iben Christensen and Emma Power and Leanne Togher and Sophie Brassel and Elise Elbourn and Naomi Folder and Jensen, {Lise Randrup}",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1080/09602011.2023.2274625",
language = "English",
journal = "Neuropsychological Rehabilitation",
issn = "0960-2011",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communication between rehabilitation staff and people with traumatic brain injury

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Christensen, Iben

AU - Power, Emma

AU - Togher, Leanne

AU - Brassel, Sophie

AU - Elbourn, Elise

AU - Folder, Naomi

AU - Jensen, Lise Randrup

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - This systematic review aimed to synthesize barriers and facilitators in communicative interactions between staff and people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the rehabilitation context. Searches captured published evidence up to November 2022 in MEDLINE, Embase, SCOPUS, Web of Science, CINAHL, AMED, and PsycINFO. Eligible studies reported on the communicative interaction between rehabilitation staff and adults with TBI. In total, 31 studies were included in the review; including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods designs. Quality assessment was carried out using standard checklists. Quantitative studies and quantitative components of mixed-method studies were synthesized descriptively according to reported communication barriers and facilitators. Qualitative studies and qualitative components of mixed-method studies were analysed through an inductive thematic meta-synthesis; generating six main themes with four subthemes. Themes were categorized as barriers or facilitators to communicative interaction. Findings demonstrated that cognitive-communication disorders of people with TBI challenge the communicative interaction between rehabilitation staff and people with TBI. However, the extent to which these disorders create a communicative barrier is closely related to staff’s communicative approach. While staff holding a collaborative and acknowledging approach and using supportive strategies may facilitate successful communicative interactions, staff using the opposite approach may exacerbate communication barriers.

AB - This systematic review aimed to synthesize barriers and facilitators in communicative interactions between staff and people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the rehabilitation context. Searches captured published evidence up to November 2022 in MEDLINE, Embase, SCOPUS, Web of Science, CINAHL, AMED, and PsycINFO. Eligible studies reported on the communicative interaction between rehabilitation staff and adults with TBI. In total, 31 studies were included in the review; including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods designs. Quality assessment was carried out using standard checklists. Quantitative studies and quantitative components of mixed-method studies were synthesized descriptively according to reported communication barriers and facilitators. Qualitative studies and qualitative components of mixed-method studies were analysed through an inductive thematic meta-synthesis; generating six main themes with four subthemes. Themes were categorized as barriers or facilitators to communicative interaction. Findings demonstrated that cognitive-communication disorders of people with TBI challenge the communicative interaction between rehabilitation staff and people with TBI. However, the extent to which these disorders create a communicative barrier is closely related to staff’s communicative approach. While staff holding a collaborative and acknowledging approach and using supportive strategies may facilitate successful communicative interactions, staff using the opposite approach may exacerbate communication barriers.

U2 - 10.1080/09602011.2023.2274625

DO - 10.1080/09602011.2023.2274625

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 37944003

JO - Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

JF - Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

SN - 0960-2011

ER -

ID: 337352561