‘We the People’ versus ‘We the Heads of States’: the debate on the democratic deficit of the European Union
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Documents
- We the People versus We the Heads of States the debate on the democratic deficit of the European Union
Submitted manuscript, 382 KB, PDF document
The Eurozone crisis has rekindled the debate on the democratic deficit of the European Union (EU). In this paper, the debate is reconsidered by contrasting the modus vivendi of ‘We the People’ in the USA with the modus vivendi of ‘We the Heads of States’ in the EU. It is demonstrated that many of the solutions to the alleged democratic deficit focus on how more voice can be given to ‘We the People’ on the input side, but that this goes against the functional logic of the EU system, thereby undermining its ability to govern. Instead, we argue that more attention should be given to how to increase output legitimacy, and a number of proposals are put forward. Such a reshuffling of the analytical focus is the best way forward to escape the current impasse in the debate on how to ‘fix’ democracy in the EU.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 5 |
Journal | Policy Studies |
Volume | 36 |
Issue number | 2 |
Pages (from-to) | 196-216 |
Number of pages | 21 |
ISSN | 0144-2872 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 23 Mar 2015 |
- Faculty of Social Sciences - democratic deficit, EU, output, legitimacy
Research areas
Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk
No data available
ID: 130933723