The cognitive status of stød

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

The cognitive status of stød. / Clausen, Sara Juul; Kristensen, Line Burholt.

I: Nordic Journal of Linguistics, Bind 38, 10.2015, s. 163-187.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Clausen, SJ & Kristensen, LB 2015, 'The cognitive status of stød', Nordic Journal of Linguistics, bind 38, s. 163-187. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586515000141

APA

Clausen, S. J., & Kristensen, L. B. (2015). The cognitive status of stød. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 38, 163-187. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586515000141

Vancouver

Clausen SJ, Kristensen LB. The cognitive status of stød. Nordic Journal of Linguistics. 2015 okt.;38:163-187. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586515000141

Author

Clausen, Sara Juul ; Kristensen, Line Burholt. / The cognitive status of stød. I: Nordic Journal of Linguistics. 2015 ; Bind 38. s. 163-187.

Bibtex

@article{572b29e7e876425faa969fb45d0d7599,
title = "The cognitive status of st{\o}d",
abstract = "The Danish prosodic phenomenon st{\o}d is associated with a specific range of suffixes including the singular definite suffixes -en and -et. Diachronically, as well as distributionally, st{\o}d is related to Swedish/Norwegian accent 1, but unlike accent 1, st{\o}d is seen as phonetically and phonologically marked. Keeping in mind the cross-distribution between phonetic/phonological markedness and distributional patterns, we investigate here whether st{\o}d is also related to accent 1 when it comes to cognitive markedness. We present the results of a psycholinguistic study in which participants attended to words that were either appropriate combinations of prosody (st{\o}d vs. non-st{\o}d) and suffix (singular definite -en/-et vs. plural indefinite -e) or mismatches between prosody and suffix. Participants gave slower and more inaccurate responses to mismatches. This effect of mismatch was most pronounced for words with non-st{\o}d stems, indicating that the cognitive markedness status of st{\o}d corresponds to that of accent 2.",
author = "Clausen, {Sara Juul} and Kristensen, {Line Burholt}",
year = "2015",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1017/S0332586515000141",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "163--187",
journal = "Nordic Journal of Linguistics",
issn = "0332-5865",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The cognitive status of stød

AU - Clausen, Sara Juul

AU - Kristensen, Line Burholt

PY - 2015/10

Y1 - 2015/10

N2 - The Danish prosodic phenomenon stød is associated with a specific range of suffixes including the singular definite suffixes -en and -et. Diachronically, as well as distributionally, stød is related to Swedish/Norwegian accent 1, but unlike accent 1, stød is seen as phonetically and phonologically marked. Keeping in mind the cross-distribution between phonetic/phonological markedness and distributional patterns, we investigate here whether stød is also related to accent 1 when it comes to cognitive markedness. We present the results of a psycholinguistic study in which participants attended to words that were either appropriate combinations of prosody (stød vs. non-stød) and suffix (singular definite -en/-et vs. plural indefinite -e) or mismatches between prosody and suffix. Participants gave slower and more inaccurate responses to mismatches. This effect of mismatch was most pronounced for words with non-stød stems, indicating that the cognitive markedness status of stød corresponds to that of accent 2.

AB - The Danish prosodic phenomenon stød is associated with a specific range of suffixes including the singular definite suffixes -en and -et. Diachronically, as well as distributionally, stød is related to Swedish/Norwegian accent 1, but unlike accent 1, stød is seen as phonetically and phonologically marked. Keeping in mind the cross-distribution between phonetic/phonological markedness and distributional patterns, we investigate here whether stød is also related to accent 1 when it comes to cognitive markedness. We present the results of a psycholinguistic study in which participants attended to words that were either appropriate combinations of prosody (stød vs. non-stød) and suffix (singular definite -en/-et vs. plural indefinite -e) or mismatches between prosody and suffix. Participants gave slower and more inaccurate responses to mismatches. This effect of mismatch was most pronounced for words with non-stød stems, indicating that the cognitive markedness status of stød corresponds to that of accent 2.

U2 - 10.1017/S0332586515000141

DO - 10.1017/S0332586515000141

M3 - Journal article

VL - 38

SP - 163

EP - 187

JO - Nordic Journal of Linguistics

JF - Nordic Journal of Linguistics

SN - 0332-5865

ER -

ID: 138811441